![]() |
|
The Force-Field Analytic Problem Solving Model was developed by Kurt Lewin in the 1940's. Since that time it has been widely used as technique for encouraging groups of people to tackle organizational issues that previously seemed too complex or too deeply rooted to approach. Community groups, governmental agencies, business teams and many other organizations have successfully applied the model to their problems.
It has been our observation that most work groups do no use a systematic strategy for solving problems. A simple model such as this one can provide a fresh and innovative approach to a perennial problem.
In any problem situation, the existing condition (status quo) has been reached because of a number of opposing forces.
Some of these forces (Drivers) push toward a solution to the problem.
Other forces (Restrainers) inhibit improvement or solution of the problem.
When the strength of the Drivers is approximately equal to the strength of the Restrainers, a balance or status quo is apparent.
Until the relative strength of the forces is changed, the problem will continue to persist.
Step 1 - Carefully and fully specify the problem (status quo). A problem may be defined as the difference between what currently exists and what should be. (5 minutes)
Step 2 - Define your objectives. What will the situation be like when it is solved? (5 minutes)
Step 3 - Brainstorm (without initial analysis) the Driving Forces and the Restraining Forces that contribute to the problem. (10 minutes)
Step 4 - Analyze these forces more fully. Develop a strategy for strengthening the Driving Forces under your control and weakening the Restraining Forces you can realistically do something about. (15 minutes)
Step 5 - Consider your strategy against your objectives. Will your problem solving strategy promote a change in the status quo? (5 minutes)
A group of store management personnel had identified poor customer service as a critical problem to be solved. After completing Steps 1 and 2, they might brainstorm the possible Drivers and Restrainers that were contributing to the Status Quo, in the following manner.
STEP 1: ANALYZE THE STATUS QUO. |
Begin your problem solving by analyzing the current situation (Status Quo).
|
Problem Statement: Promised delivery times to customers are not always met. Analysis:
|
STEP 2: DEFINE YOUR OBJECTIVE(S). |
If the problem were solved, what would the situation be like?
|
Identify the objective(s)
|
STEP 3: BRAINSTORM THE DRIVING FORCES (first) AND THE RESTRAINING FORCES (second) CONTRIBUTING TO THE FORCE FIELD. |
To Brainstorm, means to generate ideas without judging their merit.
|
|
STEP 4: DEVELOP A SOLUTION STRATEGY. |
Now is the time to become critical. Using your rational skills, select our the 3 or 4 Drivers and Restrainers your group can realistically do something about. Test your realism against these Circles of Influence. Your strategy should be composed of only Circle A Drivers and Restrainers. List the Drivers you will attempt to strengthen and the Restrainers you will attempt to weaken.
|
The Plan Strategy Driver 1. Consolidate the scheduling decision-making process Driver 2. Improve accuracy of time estimates Driver 3. Computerize scheduling, production control and reporting Driver 4. Obtain/Promote management commitment to quality and delivery Driver 5. Seek out more creative manufacturing processes Restrainer 1. Expand size of plant Restrainer 2. Reduce rework Restrainer 3. Achieve agreement on plant overcapacity philosophy Restrainer 4. Improve quality and quantity and response times from outside
sources |
STEP 5: COMPARE YOUR STRATEGY TO YOUR OBJECTIVE(S). |
Describe how the strategies selected will help achieve the objective(s) set. (How will the Force Field be unbalanced so that the gap may be closed?) Evaluation of the Application After the team has completed the Force-Field application, time should be spent in critiquing the team's use of the model.
|
Compare the strategy (Step 4) with the Objectives (Step 2) (will the strategy accomplish the objective(s)?) Implement the strategy by finalizing and acting upon:
Definitions:
|